Saturday, April 19, 2014
thetallblacknerd:

discountbongsanddildos:

girlgrowingsmall:

likeclockworkcircles:

lil-lady-kate:

Amazingly, lots of people still believe that they are ”omnivores”, despite the fact that there are no scientific facts to support these claims, and this wrong classification is based on ”dietary habits” or ”observations” that humans generally eat a wide variety of plant and animal foods, not on anatomical design. Truth is, humans have nothing in common with true meat eaters.”True carnivores (and omnivores) salivate about the idea of eating whole prey animals when they see them. Humans do not. We’re interested in eating the body parts only because they’ve been removed from the original animal and processed, and because we grew up eating them, making it seem perfectly normal. It’s amazing how much of a disconnect we’ve been able to learn about the difference between animals and food. As GoVeg puts it:While carnivores take pleasure in killing animals and eating their raw flesh, any human who killed an animal with his or her bare hands and dug into the raw corpse would be considered deranged. Carnivorous animals are aroused by the scent of blood and the thrill of the chase. Most humans, on the other hand, are revolted by the sight of raw flesh and cannot tolerate hearing the screams of animals being ripped apart and killed. The bloody reality of eating animals is innately repulsive to us, more proof that we were not designed to eat meat.Ask yourself: When you see dead animals on the side of the road, are you tempted to stop for a snack? Does the sight of a dead bird make you salivate? Do you daydream about killing cows with your bare hands and eating them raw? If you answered “no” to all of these questions, congratulations—you’re a normal human herbivore—like it or not. Humans were simply not designed to eat meat. Humans lack both the physical characteristics of carnivores and the instinct that drives them to kill animals and devour their raw carcasses.http://michaelbluejay.com/veg/natural.html

Ok, for one?
Of fucking course we don’t share anything in common with “true meat eaters”. Are you blind? It’s because we’re not meat eaters. We’re fucking OMNIVORES.
Herbivores =/= Omnivores =/= Carnivores.
Each fucking subset has evolved differently from the rest and has evolutionary sets that fit their diet and their diet specifically. So while we don’t resemble “true meat eaters” because we were never Carnivores in the first place, we also don’t resemble “true Herbivores” either because we evolved past that. Want to know what we DO resemble though? OTHER FUCKING OMNIVORES.
Second: Actually, humans never ate raw meat in the first place and anyone who says so is a fucking idiot because archaeology has already disproven this. And if we did, it was for a VERY short period and not long enough to fuck with our evolution.
Fun fucking fact: The introduction of meat to our diet directly corresponds anthropologically with THE INVENTION OF COOKING AND ADDITION OF IT TO OUR LIFESTYLE. Therefore while we evolved to be Omnivores and eat meat as a small part of our diet, we never evolved to eat RAW meat.
Third? Jesus fucking Christ. We are not evolutionarily equipped to go out and catch prey with our bare hands.
Why? Because, again, WE DID NOT EVOLVE TO DO THAT.
So instead of needing to evolve the capability to run at fast speeds, long claws capable of rending flesh, and have a mouth full of 20 something sharp as fuck teeth? We developed tools. We developed cooking. We developed group hunting techniques. And since we’re still. Fucking. Here today instead of dying out like evolutionary failures are prone to doing? I’d say its worked out for us in the end pretty fucking well in the end so far.
We have a much higher brain capacity. We don’t NEED to and never did because we are more intelligent, have opposable thumbs and were capable of developing things to aid us before these things were evolutionarily required of us. We were, literally, never meant to or were in an evolutionary position that required us to catch our living prey like Carnivores did.
HUMANS HAVE BASICALLY BEEN ONE LONG STRAIN OF “FUCK EVOLUTION”.
Lastly I just want to touch on this ridiculous thing someone wrote on this post at some point: “Obv. I never said they didn’t. They even evolved to consume milk, well most have. But that doesn’t mean it was physically intended for our bodies originally. That’s the point of this whole post. Not what we’ve “evolved” to do but what our bodies and minds are hard wired for FROM THE VERY BEGINNING TO NOW. And it’s mostly about the mental state it would take that 90% of people don’t have”.
Like… Are you kidding? Please tell me you are fucking kidding. Do you know how evolution works in terms of diet? Food source becomes scarce while another becomes plentiful, species adapts to eat said food source… Or it dies. What we were not originally designer to eat CHANGES as new food sources evolve, and as we are required to adapt and evolve. The more food you adapt and evolve to eat, the more likely your species is to continue surviving as food sources come in and out of availability.
Literally. Diet depends on fucking evolution and evolution is widely dependent on diet in some circumstances. You cannot fucking remove them and separate them and pretend one isn’t necessary to have this fucking discussion. You cannot take a fucking issue about diet, claim we’re something we’re not, and completely erase the evolutionary portion of the fucking argument because IT IS A REQUIRED PORTION.
YOU ARE LITERALLY ATTEMPTING TO ERASE CONTEXT FROM A SITUATION THAT 100% REQUIRES. THE FUCKING. CONTEXT. OF EVOLUTION.
DO YOU FUCKERS EVEN KNOW HOW TO FUCKING SCIENCE?!
Yes, there very much is plenty of scientific evidence that Omnivore is a classification of diet. So is Fruitivore, Insectivore, Carnivore, Herbavore, and several other classifications.
The Omnivore dietary classification is seriously defined as an animal whose diet and lifestyle relies on obtaining protein and energy from both plant and animal sources- which may also include animal byproducts such as eggs and dairy, or things like insects, fungi and algae.
New flash: Humans are not the only fucking Omnivores and the classification is not based solely on the dietary needs of HUMANS, but the observation of SEVERAL OTHER ANIMALS.
Corvids are Omnivores.
Bears (save for a few species) are Omnivores.
Pigs are fucking Omnivores.
Badgers are Omnivores.
Foxes (some species) are Omnivores.
Chickens are fucking Omnivoers.
Here’s a nice fucking worksheet for you, and another one, and oh LOOK ANOTHER ONE.
Your science is fucking bunk.
Get the fuck out.

I totally thought this post was about how silly “raw diets” are. Then I was pissed off at the anti-meat bullshit. But then the reply to that crap… the science… the facts… it’s so beautiful.


Also, just because animals are too stupid to cook and season their food does not mean they are better than us. If lions could grill and slather a wildebeest in A1 sauce you know they would fucking do it.

So by OP logic if you dont get a boner looking at wild plants and bugs that means you aren’t a vegan or vegetarian

If you really think this is natural, dig up a potato with your bare hands and teeth and devour it. Raw. 

No cooking, no seasoning, no sauces, Fox only, Final Destination.
Then tell me how you love the taste of vegetables.
This also goes for eggplant, olives, quinoa and any number of other vegetables and grains which are horrible and distasteful to eat in their natural state, if not outright dangerous.
I really wish that tumblr-vegans would realize that smugly passing off shitty unscientific drivel about how humans are herbivores actually ends up hurting their cause rather than convincing anyone of shit. People don’t really like being lied to, or treated like idiots when they point it out.

thetallblacknerd:

discountbongsanddildos:

girlgrowingsmall:

likeclockworkcircles:

lil-lady-kate:

Amazingly, lots of people still believe that they are ”omnivores”, despite the fact that there are no scientific facts to support these claims, and this wrong classification is based on ”dietary habits” or ”observations” that humans generally eat a wide variety of plant and animal foods, not on anatomical design. Truth is, humans have nothing in common with true meat eaters.

”True carnivores (and omnivores) salivate about the idea of eating whole prey animals when they see them. Humans do not. We’re interested in eating the body parts only because they’ve been removed from the original animal and processed, and because we grew up eating them, making it seem perfectly normal. It’s amazing how much of a disconnect we’ve been able to learn about the difference between animals and food. As GoVeg puts it:

While carnivores take pleasure in killing animals and eating their raw flesh, any human who killed an animal with his or her bare hands and dug into the raw corpse would be considered deranged. Carnivorous animals are aroused by the scent of blood and the thrill of the chase. Most humans, on the other hand, are revolted by the sight of raw flesh and cannot tolerate hearing the screams of animals being ripped apart and killed. The bloody reality of eating animals is innately repulsive to us, more proof that we were not designed to eat meat.

Ask yourself: When you see dead animals on the side of the road, are you tempted to stop for a snack? Does the sight of a dead bird make you salivate? Do you daydream about killing cows with your bare hands and eating them raw? If you answered “no” to all of these questions, congratulations—you’re a normal human herbivore—like it or not. Humans were simply not designed to eat meat. Humans lack both the physical characteristics of carnivores and the instinct that drives them to kill animals and devour their raw carcasses.

http://michaelbluejay.com/veg/natural.html

Ok, for one?

Of fucking course we don’t share anything in common with “true meat eaters”. Are you blind? It’s because we’re not meat eaters. We’re fucking OMNIVORES.

Herbivores =/= Omnivores =/= Carnivores.

Each fucking subset has evolved differently from the rest and has evolutionary sets that fit their diet and their diet specifically. So while we don’t resemble “true meat eaters” because we were never Carnivores in the first place, we also don’t resemble “true Herbivores” either because we evolved past that. Want to know what we DO resemble though? OTHER FUCKING OMNIVORES.

Second: Actually, humans never ate raw meat in the first place and anyone who says so is a fucking idiot because archaeology has already disproven this. And if we did, it was for a VERY short period and not long enough to fuck with our evolution.

Fun fucking fact: The introduction of meat to our diet directly corresponds anthropologically with THE INVENTION OF COOKING AND ADDITION OF IT TO OUR LIFESTYLE. Therefore while we evolved to be Omnivores and eat meat as a small part of our diet, we never evolved to eat RAW meat.

Third? Jesus fucking Christ. We are not evolutionarily equipped to go out and catch prey with our bare hands.

Why? Because, again, WE DID NOT EVOLVE TO DO THAT.

So instead of needing to evolve the capability to run at fast speeds, long claws capable of rending flesh, and have a mouth full of 20 something sharp as fuck teeth? We developed tools. We developed cooking. We developed group hunting techniques. And since we’re still. Fucking. Here today instead of dying out like evolutionary failures are prone to doing? I’d say its worked out for us in the end pretty fucking well in the end so far.

We have a much higher brain capacity. We don’t NEED to and never did because we are more intelligent, have opposable thumbs and were capable of developing things to aid us before these things were evolutionarily required of us. We were, literally, never meant to or were in an evolutionary position that required us to catch our living prey like Carnivores did.

HUMANS HAVE BASICALLY BEEN ONE LONG STRAIN OF “FUCK EVOLUTION”.

Lastly I just want to touch on this ridiculous thing someone wrote on this post at some point: Obv. I never said they didn’t. They even evolved to consume milk, well most have. But that doesn’t mean it was physically intended for our bodies originally. That’s the point of this whole post. Not what we’ve “evolved” to do but what our bodies and minds are hard wired for FROM THE VERY BEGINNING TO NOW. And it’s mostly about the mental state it would take that 90% of people don’t have”.

Like… Are you kidding? Please tell me you are fucking kidding. Do you know how evolution works in terms of diet? Food source becomes scarce while another becomes plentiful, species adapts to eat said food source… Or it dies. What we were not originally designer to eat CHANGES as new food sources evolve, and as we are required to adapt and evolve. The more food you adapt and evolve to eat, the more likely your species is to continue surviving as food sources come in and out of availability.

Literally. Diet depends on fucking evolution and evolution is widely dependent on diet in some circumstances. You cannot fucking remove them and separate them and pretend one isn’t necessary to have this fucking discussion. You cannot take a fucking issue about diet, claim we’re something we’re not, and completely erase the evolutionary portion of the fucking argument because IT IS A REQUIRED PORTION.

YOU ARE LITERALLY ATTEMPTING TO ERASE CONTEXT FROM A SITUATION THAT 100% REQUIRES. THE FUCKING. CONTEXT. OF EVOLUTION.

DO YOU FUCKERS EVEN KNOW HOW TO FUCKING SCIENCE?!

Yes, there very much is plenty of scientific evidence that Omnivore is a classification of diet. So is Fruitivore, Insectivore, Carnivore, Herbavore, and several other classifications.

The Omnivore dietary classification is seriously defined as an animal whose diet and lifestyle relies on obtaining protein and energy from both plant and animal sources- which may also include animal byproducts such as eggs and dairy, or things like insects, fungi and algae.

New flash: Humans are not the only fucking Omnivores and the classification is not based solely on the dietary needs of HUMANS, but the observation of SEVERAL OTHER ANIMALS.

  • Corvids are Omnivores.
  • Bears (save for a few species) are Omnivores.
  • Pigs are fucking Omnivores.
  • Badgers are Omnivores.
  • Foxes (some species) are Omnivores.
  • Chickens are fucking Omnivoers.

Here’s a nice fucking worksheet for youand another one, and oh LOOK ANOTHER ONE.

Your science is fucking bunk.

Get the fuck out.

I totally thought this post was about how silly “raw diets” are. Then I was pissed off at the anti-meat bullshit. But then the reply to that crap… the science… the facts… it’s so beautiful.

image

Also, just because animals are too stupid to cook and season their food does not mean they are better than us.

If lions could grill and slather a wildebeest in A1 sauce you know they would fucking do it.

So by OP logic if you dont get a boner looking at wild plants and bugs that means you aren’t a vegan or vegetarian

If you really think this is natural, dig up a potato with your bare hands and teeth and devour it. Raw.

No cooking, no seasoning, no sauces, Fox only, Final Destination.

Then tell me how you love the taste of vegetables.

This also goes for eggplant, olives, quinoa and any number of other vegetables and grains which are horrible and distasteful to eat in their natural state, if not outright dangerous.

I really wish that tumblr-vegans would realize that smugly passing off shitty unscientific drivel about how humans are herbivores actually ends up hurting their cause rather than convincing anyone of shit. People don’t really like being lied to, or treated like idiots when they point it out.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014 Sunday, April 13, 2014

gutsygumshoe:

if you forget it’s jane crocker’s birthday today too:

  1. you’re trash
  2. i probably (definately) hate you

Monday, April 7, 2014

Anonymous asked: i take it that you rp vriska?

I did for a brief while, before the sea of disconnects and ‘MALES ONLY’ demands drove me to switch to more popular characters. Also I kept getting shitty Johns and Tavroses who just wanted shipping. I still love rping WITH good Vriskas, though - it’s a shame they’re so rare nowadays.

I apologize for being a filthy sell-out.

Sunday, April 6, 2014 Saturday, April 5, 2014

pyrozod:

thii2ii2tupiid:

pyrozod:

REALLY CHECK YOUR FACTS PEOPLE DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU BELIEVE ON TUMBLR BECAUSE 9/10 TIMES ITS EITHER EXAGGERATED OR COMPLETELY FAKE

GOOGLE YAHOO OR EVEN BING YES BING OF ALL THINGS

DONT GO AROUND CAUSING PANIC OR SPREADING FALSE INFORMATION JUST BECAUSE YOU WANT TO BE NOTICED THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF OTHER THINGS YOU CAN DO FOR THAT

this has been a psa

and if it’s a suspicious/dramatic looking picture, a quick image search will reveal the actual context.
another great place as a go-to??  snopes.  always check snopes on popular posts. 

thank you

Remember that time someone took a closeup picture of a horse dildo and claimed it was an African burn victims arm that had received shitty skin-grafts

And then thousands of people reblogged the ‘burn victim’ as though their ‘efforts’ were actually helping anyone before someone thought to do five minutes of research and found ‘no, this is actually a fake horse phallus’

Lord almighty.

Friday, April 4, 2014

tentacletherapissed:

ireallyshouldnthavea:

The platypus is a seriously underrated animal. I’m about to die.

i thought their claws were poisonous????

They are venomous! But only the back claws, and only on the males. Not sure of the sex of this particular plat, but even if it’s a male it’s clearly used to people and doesn’t have an incentive to go shoving its spurs into them. And the venom isn’t deadly either, just very painful. I’d risk getting stabbed to play with a friendly one, they’re so cute.

Fuck, now I wish I had a platypus bro.

tentacletherapissed:

ireallyshouldnthavea:

The platypus is a seriously underrated animal. I’m about to die.

i thought their claws were poisonous????

They are! But only the back ones, and only on the males. Not sure of the sex of this particular plat, but even if it’s a male it’s clearly used to people and probably won’t go shoving its spurs into them. And the venom isn’t deadly either, just very painful. I’d risk getting stabbed to play with a friendly one, they’re so cute.

Fuck, now I wish I had a platypus bro.

tentacletherapissed:

ireallyshouldnthavea:

The platypus is a seriously underrated animal. I’m about to die.

i thought their claws were poisonous????

They are! But only the back ones, and only on the males. Not sure of the sex of this particular plat, but even if it’s a male it’s clearly used to people and probably won’t go shoving its spurs into them. And the venom isn’t deadly either, just very painful. I’d risk getting stabbed to play with a friendly one, they’re so cute.

Fuck, now I wish I had a platypus bro.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014
sushinfood:

capriciouscannibal:

funwithomegle:

the-unpopular-opinions:

The chances of being arrested for roleplaying smut with someone under 18 are literally so goddamn slim. They’re consenting to it, and you’re literally posing as two people who are not real and more than often over the age of consent themselves, there’s no harm in it.

It’s still kind of against the law, and not everyone is comfortable with roleplaying sex when a minor is on the other end.

like there is the fact there are people who are well into their twenties, thirties and such who RP on various websites that minors are on. and people HAVE BEEN CHARGED because of RPing smut with a minor. so just saying “the chances are slim” as an excuse to do it is dumb, and just asking to be caught. 

As I am twenty eight years old, even being in a group room where NSFW is allowed and knowing people RPing smut in there are like 16yrs old and lower makes me feel absolutely horrible and often interrupts my ability to role play for the sake of not wanting to be around what could be done privately.

BROTIP: People don’t have to be individually charged with sharing erotic material with a minor for repercussions to happen. If it gets out that a website - such as Cherubplay or MSPARP or what have you - has a ‘look the other way’ policy on grown-adults erotically roleplaying with people who are legally children, then the heat could come down on the owners of the site. 
Also, if your only qualm with roleplaying pornography with a goddamn 14 year-old is ‘Eeek I might get caught’ then you should probably have a good hard think about what led you to think that way.

sushinfood:

capriciouscannibal:

funwithomegle:

the-unpopular-opinions:

The chances of being arrested for roleplaying smut with someone under 18 are literally so goddamn slim. They’re consenting to it, and you’re literally posing as two people who are not real and more than often over the age of consent themselves, there’s no harm in it.

It’s still kind of against the law, and not everyone is comfortable with roleplaying sex when a minor is on the other end.

like there is the fact there are people who are well into their twenties, thirties and such who RP on various websites that minors are on. and people HAVE BEEN CHARGED because of RPing smut with a minor. so just saying “the chances are slim” as an excuse to do it is dumb, and just asking to be caught. 

As I am twenty eight years old, even being in a group room where NSFW is allowed and knowing people RPing smut in there are like 16yrs old and lower makes me feel absolutely horrible and often interrupts my ability to role play for the sake of not wanting to be around what could be done privately.

BROTIP: People don’t have to be individually charged with sharing erotic material with a minor for repercussions to happen. If it gets out that a website - such as Cherubplay or MSPARP or what have you - has a ‘look the other way’ policy on grown-adults erotically roleplaying with people who are legally children, then the heat could come down on the owners of the site.

Also, if your only qualm with roleplaying pornography with a goddamn 14 year-old is ‘Eeek I might get caught’ then you should probably have a good hard think about what led you to think that way.